Leeseberg & Valentine

Penthouse One 175 South Third Street Columbus, OH 43215

A Reputation Built By Success
Call For A Free Consultation
Toll Free: 800-976-2226 | Local: 614-221-2223

Translation services available.

Practice Areas

Ohio Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Patient in "Medical Records" Case

On March 23, 2016, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that any patient data kept by a health care provider, regardless of location, is a medical record that must be released to patients and families. Earlier in the year, we wrote about the dangers of letting medical providers determine what is and is not a "medical record." You can also read an in depth analysis of the court's decision from former judge and University of Cincinnati College of Law professor emerita Marianna Bettman here.

Here is partner Gerry Leeseberg's reaction to this decision:

"It is simply inconceivable that any Justice would consider allowing the custodian of any information pertaining to a patient's condition (and not just reflecting care provided) to determine what is, and what is not, available to a patient, or their legal representative by formulating their own arbitrary definition of what a "medical record" is. The suggestion that it should be permitted because "routine sanitization" of patient records is unlikely because of "health care regulation" is ludicrous. First of all, the latter has nothing to do with the former. Secondly, it is not "routine sanitization" that is a concern: it is the conscious decision to destroy relevant evidence that bears on responsibility and accountability for a poor patient outcome. There was nothing in the hospital's position that prevented a hospital from making such an arbitrary decision on an ad hoc basis - for example, whenever a care provider advised risk management that there was a "problem", or in response to a statutory notice of intent to sue. It's called "doctoring the record" for a reason."

Fortunately, the Supreme Court came to the correct decision and prevented hospitals from being able to strategically place certain records in a different department in an effort to avoid liability. This decision will allow for patients and their attorneys to fully and accurately evaluate whether they received proper care and treatment, as they will have access to every medical record, regardless of where the document is stored.

If you or someone you know has been a victim of medical negligence, please contact our office today to see if we can be of assistance to you.

Our Recent Blog Posts

  • Jul 17 : Officials push to change federal rule limiting number of beds in addiction facilities
    Like many states throughout the country, Ohio has been battling an opioid epidemic for several years and many victims of this epidemic are seeking treatment. With so many Ohioans seeking treatment, it is difficult for treatment facilities to make room...
  • Jul 14 : Misdiagnosis: When you pay the price for your doctor's oversight
    Misdiagnosis. It shouldn't happen, but, unfortunately, it does, and on an alarmingly frequent basis. When it occurs, it's obviously a problem because before you can get the proper treatment you need, you need doctors to identify the illness you have....
Read More Blog Posts

Our Awards

Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | U.S. News & World Report | 2017 Columbus Lawyer Finder Member | Columbus Bar Association | Columbus Lawyer Finder.com AVVO Rating 10.0 | Superb | Top Attorney Personal Injury AVVO Rating 10.0 | Superb | Top Attorney Medical Malpractice Super lawyers 2005-2017